Activity

Which it is the goal of the activity?
To think about the existence of the sences, things and the moral and compare our conclusions with other, noting that everything is subjective.

What were the differences between talking to people I know and those who do not?
Talking with those who I  know, I just note that our answares were similar and I can see the same things since an other point of view, but when I talk with a person that I do not know so much, I could see that we defered in some things and that everyone is influenced with experiences and the people which is around, I think there is not a general law for what is real or not, it is just a way in which we watch the universe.

Which  question I can not  resolved?
Is there something that really can be experienced objectively?

Results

We analyze the group of economics and administrative sciences which was formed by 6 students.
The experiment was made successfully but I found a little drawback, we could not get everyone involved.
I realized that only three students were interested in the activity, two just watched  and one was in another world.
We needed to ask some questions which were the clue so they could achieve the goal, for the fist clue  all the group was involved and they could  get  it because of an apriory knowledge which they have experience last year on a electronic class, and with that clue Quetzali could choose the correct material, then just she and two students were trying to turn on the LED, I think that if Quetzali would not be there the students could not achieve the goal because despite they had the apriory knowledge they could not join the previous experience (know and experience how a LED turn on and what is that thing which permit turn it on) with the materials they had, Quetzali told to her classmates:  "the motor can generate energy, because of that a motor moves things" and afther all of them, except one, began to tell Quetzali that connected the LED and it turn on, once achieve the goal we asked to twisk the motor bakwards and they note that the LED did not turn on, Jonathan saw that the metalic part of the LED stick to the motor and asked us if the motor had magnets (he knew that a magnet attracts metals because he had an experience), we answered yes and Quetzali said: maybe is because of the polarity.
They could construct the new knowledge (a motor can turn on a LED) because of previous experiences, so that is the reason of why we consider that this was a way of constructivism.

Constructivism

Group`s aim: that our classmates learn who the energy is suministred to a led and that no just a battery can suminist energy

Description: the activity consist in give some materials, including a motor and a LED, then, ask the LED light, once students have achieved that we will question why the motor can light the LED and after we will help them so taht they can construct the knowlwdge which will be the reason of why a motor can turn on a LED.

Instructions:

1) Deliver 3 cables, one motor, one LED and  aluminum

2) Ask to choose materials that they think can turn the LED

3) Ask them to explain why they believe that the material they have chosen, can turn on the LED.

4) Once they have told us, tell them to use the material and try turning on the LED

6) If they can’t turn on the led explain them why

5) If the LED lights up tell them to complete their conclusion on why it lights up with the material they have chosen

 • The motor is the only material that can turn on the LED.

The method by which our classmates are learning is constructivism because they are absorbing knowledge throught the experience. 

Before can have a conclussion they needed to do it, relate it to what they have experienced before and linking that with what they are experimenting in that moment building new knowledge.

Some philosophers

Si sabemos que la mayoría vive en un error, ¿podemos basar el rumbo de la sociedad en sus deseos?
No porque quien viven en un error actúa con error y por consiguiente sus pensamientos y deseos son un error, en ocasiones el mas fuerte es quien domina el mundo y si esta dominando erróneamente al resto de la sociedad, esta estará  pasando por situaciones basadas en un deseo errado.

¿Debemos otorgar el poder a aquellos que mas lo merecen?
Si quien lo merece es una persona con humildad y deseo por apoyar a la sociedad, sí, pero si con  "quien mas lo merece" se refiere al mas débil, entonces no, porque al obtener poder la sociedad tomaría papeles invertidos donde quien menos lo merecía pasa a ser el alienado y el que mas lo merecía se transforma en capataz.

¿Los intereses individuales dependen de los intereses que la sociedad opina que son mas importantes?
   Es cierto cuando la integridad del individuo no esta siendo afectada,  la gente sigue tendencias, modas y estilos, sin embargo cuando la integridad se ve amenazada es todo lo contrario porque es entonces cuando el individuo puede notar que la sociedad esta actuando de una manera injusta, incorrecta o no necesaria y esto va contra sus propios intereses.

¿Podemos decir que el Estado regula la forma bajo la cual todos vivimos?
No, seria imposible tener a mas de un millón de gente vigilada para saber si esta actuando de la forma que la ley dicta.

¿Cómo podemos dejar de oponer el hecho de que cada individuo tiene la libertad de elegir lo que hace y que la sociedad tiene intereses legítimos en regular las acciones de cada individuo?
Sabiendo que la libertad total no existe porque cada individuo tiene libertad y entonces esa libertad puede cortar la libertad de su prójimo, pero de ser posible esta libertad seria cortada cuando los lideres de una sociedad pueden controlar las acciones supuestamente libres, que dejan de ser libres al ser vigiladas, escritas o dictaminadas por alguien mas.

¿Existen concepciones alternativas al cómo debemos vivir?
Si, aunque a veces no las vemos, y al conocer otras podemos saber si funcionan observando la forma de vida de quien las emplea.

Knowledge?

Objetive: to represent with photos the next:

The majority can often be wrong.

We represent like that because people always will think that what they are doing is good and we walk been sure that our way is the correct, but sometimes exists the possibility that we can be mistaken and just one can be in the correct way

There can be a difference between human opinion and true knowledge.

That image represents the true knowledge in the book and the person explaining what she read is the opinion, because  when we are explaining or counting what the book says,  people  add or says that giving a personal  interpretation, what she/ he understand.

The truth is not always what is obvious or what is directly in front of our eyes

 The truth is represented in this image as the cahir, one person sees a blue chair that fisically exists, and the other person is looking at ohter chair completely different, both are in front of the spectator`s eyes but, which is the truth? We can see both chairs and are there, but the way we persive that not always is what it is the real chair can be the white one, even if it is nothing more than an image because reality is not always materialized.

Be wary of obvious knowledge

We need to be wary with what we consider obviouos knowledge because the perseption of our position can affect the reality, in the image the  girl on the left side thiks that what she  is watching is  a 100% truth, and the girl on the right thiks the same because is what she is watching, both see through the same organ, the eye, but one sees the world from another perseption, other position.

A danger for society

Forever in the history of humanity  have been problems in the increasing formation of society. Now a days a danger for this formation is the absolute loss of values.
I consider that respect is the most important value for better relations between us and our environment, disrespect towards our own nation has caused the loss of our natural resources and territory, lack of respect for life causes killings and lack of respect for others cause conflicts.
I found sad that we as living beings do not respect life, since the life of a person to a flower and that is a danger  because it is not possible that we  kill a human being while we are humans in the same way it is not possible that we finish with the animal and plant´s life when we live from those.
Loss of values is a danger for the society in a cultural, political and human way because corrupts,  disarms an order implanted by society and also the order implanted by nature.
The type of education and training that people get can be a hazard when they are not  mould with the basis of the values morally correct and accepted.